Saturday, June 2, 2012

Saturday Swap for June 2012

In case you haven't already guessed, Saturday Swap is a meme designed to connect book swappers with other book swappers. I hope it's a meme that'll catch on; we've had a couple of great months so far. Here's how it works: On the first Saturday of each month, I'll put up a Saturday Swap post with a linky for just that purpose. The rules are:
  1. For Bloggers: Make a post on your blog letting everyone know what books you have available for swap. I suggest linking to your wishlist as well (on your blog, Amazon, BD, Goodreads, wherever), for swifter swapping. For Non-Bloggers: Leave a comment listing the books you have available for swap. Include your email in the comment so interested parties can contact you directly.
  2. Grab the button or create your own, but please link back to Ruby's Reads. All the cool people are doing it.
  3. Once your post is live, enter your info in the linky so everyone can see what you've got. 
  4. The circumstances surrounding the swaps are up to the individuals. I'm not responsible for lost books. If you're nervous about swapping with someone you don't know, I suggest you ask for a delivery confirmation number. HOWEVER: please let me know if someone doesn't uphold their end of the bargain and I'll ban them from further swaps. 
  5. HAVE FUN!

My Books:

  1. Revived by Cat Patrick
  2. Born Wicked by Jessica Spotswood
  3. Kiss of Snow by Nalini Singh (ARC)
  4. Switched, Torn and Ascend by Amanda Hocking (I'd be willing to trade all three for one book...if it's the right book.)
  5. Belles by Jen Calonita
  6. Damned and Crusade and Unleashed (not pictured) by Nancy Holder and Debbie Viguie
  7. Everfound by Neil Shusterman
 I still have many of the books from last month's swap, so check them out! (Belles is a repeat.) I'll be out of town this week for BEA/to visit family, but I will still be accessible via email.
 
My Wishlists:


Thursday, May 31, 2012

Debate: Wordpress v. Blogger with @MandiKaye and @book_travels

Welcome to the newest Ruby's Reads Debate! Two fabulous bloggers are tackling one of the hottest issues for bloggers today: Wordpress v. Blogger. Let me begin by introducing our two debaters for the day:

For Blogger:

Photobucket
Mariana from Book Travels
Bio: I love to read and started with some Harlequin, from there to YA and Paranormal was really fast. I love anything connected with Romance and you're always going to find me with some book.
Twitter: @book_travels   

For Wordpress:

Mandi from Never Too Fond of Books
Bio: Mandi Kaye is on a mission to become an information superhero (or in layman's terms, she is an MLIS candidate from SJSU). In her spare time, she reads a lot and shares her thoughts and opinions of most of those books with the world on her blog(strikethrough this word please) portal to the imagination. Reading is truly her passion. Her favorite places to travel include Narnia, Oz, and the beach. Her favorite book is generally whatever she's reading at the time, and if you interrupt her while she's in her happy place she will cut you.
Twitter: @MandiKaye

Let's get started!

Mariana

     My first blog host was powered by Google, also called Blogger! I believe it may be the first for a huge crowd. When we start to blog, our first thought is “Where should I start?” and Blogger is the answer. It’s very simple for a beginner and has a good list of widgets to chose from making the blogging experience fun and fast.
     I’m all in favor of Blogger, you can make a new blog in a few minute and start posting without a lot of trouble. Plus it has a good platform and you can find guides and help very easily without needing a lot knowledge of html and css. Because the first impressions are always what we remember, and for me easy and simple is the best.

Mandi

     WordPress is, for me, the simplest blog platform for a beginner. Like many, I also started my first blog on Blogger, but it wasn't long before I was looking for something else. Blogger's platform is deceptively simple - so much so that it's often counter-intuitive to use. I never once had trouble with WordPress. Everything, from templates to posting is up front and exactly where you would expect it to be.
     WordPress.com blogs, while not as fully customizable as Blogger blogs, do not require any use of HTML or CSS (in fact, you *can’t* use CSS or HTML to pimp your blog’s design). There are also many widgets you can use in the sidebar, but they don’t let you get too complicated. WordPress allows you to get your feet wet and get comfortable with managing your own blog. Once you are confident and ready, you can move to a self-hosted WordPress site.

Mariana

     Wordpress for is me is okay if you’re looking for a good platform, but is only great if you’re willing to pay for self-hosted. Trust me there’s nothing wrong with Wordpress but the templates from Blogger are way better visually. And we all love a beautiful design, with our own little touches. So far Blogger made that happen for me better than Wordpress.com.
      Blogger made the experience off posting my thoughts and news so simple and pretty that I love every moment spent on my blog. From template, to creating post, everything is my choice!!!

Mandi

     I will concede that Wordpress.com has many limitations that you don't encounter with Blogger (for example, customizing your designs) which will push folks to pay for hosting to use the self-hosted version.
     It's worth every penny.
     Wordpress' platform is just better. It's far more intuitive to use and offers the ease of drag and drop when it comes to uploading images or moving widgets around in the sidebar. I have complete control over every aspect of my design and rarely need to enlist the help of someone more skilled in coding or design to help me do so. In short, it's the perfect blogging platform for me.

Mariana

     At the end what really matter is the best for you. Everyone can say great things about Blogger and Wordpress, but only you can determinate the one that make you satisfied. For me right now is Blogger, it may change who knows but I ‘m comfortable and happy.

Mandi

     In closing, I just have to continue gushing about Wordpress. There is absolutely nothing I can't do with my blog that I want to. I find the dashboard interface far more intuitive and useful than Blogger's. And for those who are maybe a little uncomfortable with managing their own website, Wordpress is the better choice. You can start with the basic account at wordpress.com and once you are comfortable with the technology, you can move to a self-hosted account that looks and feels exactly the same - with more control. In short, Wordpress works with you as you grow, which is why I will always choose it as my blogging platform.  
 
What about you? Blogger or Wordpress?
Prefer an entirely different platform? 
Have something to add?
Join the debate! 
 

Wednesday, May 30, 2012

Bookish Bundles Presents: Historicals

     Ruby's Bookish Bundles is a new feature I'm starting here on the blog. In it, I'm going to post about three books:
  • Want Now: One recently released or already published title I'm lusting after.
  • Want Soon: One upcoming title I'm looking forward to, based on things I've heard, the cover, and the description.
  • Want Someday: One upcoming title I've heard about that sounds like it could be interested but is so far off into the future it doesn't even have a cover yet.
     I love discovering new books, and I love sharing about the books I discover. However, I've been wanting to do something a little different from (and more involved than) a WoW post, so I created this new feature for myself. Since it's new, however, you'll have to bear with me as I figure out all the kinks!

     This week I'm featuring some YA historicals I can't wait to get my hands on. As long as they're not Tudor or Elizabethan, YA historicals are hard for me to resist. For some reason, those eras don't interest me. Probably because I visited Hampton Court Palace and saw how royalty lived during those times--and it made me very, very afraid to learn how much worse it must have been for "normal people." Please, do not attempt to disillusion me about any other eras. I will scream.

Want Now:
Okay, so technically, I can't have this one right now, but June 14th isn't all that far off. It was either this or Glamorous Illusions, which I am also excited about--but that won't come out until June 1. Also, I'm a sucker for anything that is "a witty take on the Classic Regency." Plus, I read a delightful review of Keeping the Castle in an issue of Shelf Awareness. Which I do occasionally read.
 
Seventeen-year-old Althea is the sole support of her entire family, and she must marry well. But there are few wealthy suitors--or suitors of any kind--in their small Yorkshire town of Lesser Hoo. Then, the young and attractive (and very rich) Lord Boring arrives, and Althea sets her plans in motion. There's only one problem; his friend and business manager Mr. Fredericks keeps getting in the way. And, as it turns out, Fredericks has his own set of plans . . . This witty take on the classic Regency--Patrice Kindl's first novel in a decade--is like literary champagne!
Want soon:
Though this cover suggests Belle Epoque or the Edwardian era, Debutantes actually takes place in the 20s. Since this is an era I have been wanting to see more of in YA, I practically squealed when I saw this one. I believe I first heard of it from Hafsah at Icey Books.
August 2, 2012
It’s 1923 and London is a whirl of jazz, dancing and parties. Violet, Daisy, Poppy and Rose Derrington are desperate to be part of it, but stuck in an enormous crumbling house in the country, with no money and no fashionable dresses, the excitement seems a lifetime away. Luckily the girls each have a plan for escaping their humdrum country life: Rose wants to be a novelist, Poppy a jazz musician and Daisy a famous film director. Violet, however, has only one ambition: to become the perfect Debutante, so that she can go to London and catch the eye of Prince George, the most eligible bachelor in the country. But a house as big and old as Beech Grove Manor hides many secrets, and Daisy is about to uncover one so huge it could ruin all their plans - ruin everything - forever.
Want Someday:
 I haven't read The Island of Dr. Moreau, but I do enjoy books written from the perspective of the children of famous (or infamous) literary characters. It's a fun way to retell the tale while giving the story a fresh twist. Now I just have to decide if I reading Moreau is necessary to appreciate The Madman's Daughter.
The Madman's Daughter
by Megan Shepard 

London, 1894. Juliet Moreau has built a life for herself—working as a maid, attending church on Sundays, and trying not to think about the scandal that ruined her life. After all, no one ever proved the rumors about her father’s gruesome experiments. But when she learns her father is alive and continuing his work on a remote tropical island, she is determined to find out if the accusations were true.

Juliet is accompanied by the doctor’s handsome young assistant and an enigmatic castaway, who both attract Juliet for very different reasons. They travel to the island only to discover the depths of her father’s madness: he has created animals that have been vivisected to resemble, speak, and behave as humans. Worse, one of the creatures has turned violent and is killing the island’s inhabitants. Juliet knows she must end her father’s dangerous experiments and escape the island, even though her horror is mixed with her own scientific curiosity. As the island falls into chaos, she discovers the extent of her father’s genius—and madness—in her own blood.


Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Top Off Tuesday: High FIVE!

     Cribbed from On a Book Bender--It’s that time again — Tuesday! — which means [we] give you shirtless men and you try to steal them away from [us]. (There's more than enough to go 'round!) Top Off Tuesdays was started by FeliciaChristi and [Amanda].  It is where [ALL OF US] share the book covers that make us swoon.  Head over to Felicia’s blog to share your Top Off Tuesday link or to see what everyone has posted. (Believe me when I tell you it's worth it.)

I may not have time to keep up my blog right now, but I always have time to answer a dare.
Nothing's sexier than a man, or five, with power tools. Sultry summer heat has nothing on the five-man crew renovating the house next door. No one could blame Kate for leaning out the window for a better view of the manscape. The nasty fall that follows isn't part of her fantasy-but the man who saves her from splattering the sidewalk is definitely the star. When Mike personally attends to her injuries, she realizes her white knight in a hard hat has a tender side, giving her no choice but to surrender to the lust that's been arcing between them since day one. In the aftermath of the best sex of her life, she whispers her most secret desire: to be ravaged by his crew. She never expected Mike would dare her to take what she wants-or that the freedom to make her most decadent desires come true could be the foundation for something lasting... Warning: This book may cause you to spontaneously combust as five hot guys bring a woman's wildest fantasies to life during one blazing summer affair.

So much more tasteful than the one with four guys, no? (Also--snerk--"five men with power tools.")

Monday, May 28, 2012

Bookish Discussion Post: The Hunt by Andrew Fukuda

      Yesterday, I reviewed The Hunt, but I'm not done discussing it. The only problem? The things I want to discuss are spoilerific! So, if you haven't read the book, I don't suggest you read any further. If you have, let's talk!

Many of the thoughts I'm including here today are lifted from my emails to Small Review. I've added a bit here and there, but primarily, I let Small know which things were either bothering me, or that I felt warranted further discussion. Small's replies are not included in this post. If you would like to see them, I'd be happy to ask her for her permission to post them. Just let me know! 
     I'm reaching the end of The Hunt, and just about when I was about to give up on Gene (hate that name) and Ashley June, they've redeemed themselves a little. I'd be crap at pretending not to be human, btw. But Gene's detachment and the fact that he's not all, "Um, we can't just let them eat the hepers...some of them are KIDS!" has put me off more than a bit. It doesn't bother me as much with Ashley June because she's not the narrator. And I get that in order to survive Gene's had to subvert all his emotions, etc, but that's something that's ingrained in human nature unless you're a sociopath. Maybe that's just the teacher in me talking, though.
     I also felt that Ashley June's offer to let Gene save the hepers was pure manipulation. There was little chance that he'd choose them over her while she was standing right there. Reading between the lines, I think Ashley June genuinely has feelings for Gene, but that there's no room for anyone else in her consciousness. The way that she cold-bloodedly killed her boyfriend cements the idea for me, and the fact that she told Gene to use the hepers to save her was the lid on the coffin of her character.
     Additionally, I'd guessed waaaaaay in the beginning (the stretch carriage scene) that Ashley June was a human, but I never, ever understood Gene's infatuation with her. I think it was Fukuda's intention to contrast Ashley June's perspective with Sissy's "leave none behind" attitude. If that's the case--and Sissy is ultimately the series' heroine--I'll be fine with that. I don't think I'll ever be on Ashley June's team, but I'm looking forward to seeing the two girls meet.
      As for the ending, It disappointed me that Gene's participation in the saving of the hepers was so inactive. He was basically forced into it, and I got the sense that he would have thrown them under the bus to save Ashley June if he could have, even to the very last. I had fully expected him to have a moment where he realized that he couldn't sacrifice Ben's life, even to save her. Instead, it was more like he had no choice but to help the hepers get away. If this doesn't change in the next book, I don't think I'll be continuing on with the series. I get that Gene has had to subvert his humanity to survive, but if it takes him too long to rediscover it--or if he is only able to do so by loving Ashley June (and screw the other guys)--then I don't really think he'll have rediscovered it at all. Because--not to get all preachy--but humanity isn't really humanity if you love one person so much you're willing to sacrifice the lives of children for him or her.
     I also think it's curious that Gene never considers killing himself rather than dying by being eaten. I mean, seems like he'd at least think about it, you know? Rather than sit around and wait to be eaten? I could buy Gene deciding he wants to fight to the last, but in his defeatist moments (when he believes he'll be discovered), he just lies down to wait until evening. I think it's pretty unbelievable that suicide wouldn't at least cross his mind, even if he couldn't go through with it in the end.

Have any thoughts on The Hunt that you'd care to share?
Want to defend Ashley June?
Disagree with me about Gene's role in saving the hepers? 
Suspect my opinion was skewed because I listened to the audio version?
SHARE!

Sunday, May 27, 2012

Audiobook Review: The Hunt (The Hunt No. 1) by Andrew Fukuda

Publisher: Macmillan Audio
Publication Date: May 8, 2012
Format: CD
Status: First in The Hunt series.
Source: Received from the publisher for review.
Genre: Teen, Dystopian, Vampires

Other Info: Fukuda is also the author of Crossing
Description and link from Goodreads): 

Don’t Sweat.  Don’t Laugh.  Don’t draw attention to yourself.  And most of all, whatever you do, do not fall in love with one of them.
Gene is different from everyone else around him.  He can’t run with lightning speed, sunlight doesn’t hurt him and he doesn’t have an unquenchable lust for blood.  Gene is a human, and he knows the rules.  Keep the truth a secret.  It’s the only way to stay alive in a world of night—a world where humans are considered a delicacy and hunted for their blood.
When he’s chosen for a once in a lifetime opportunity to hunt the last remaining humans, Gene’s carefully constructed life begins to crumble around him.  He’s thrust into the path of a girl who makes him feel things he never thought possible—and into a ruthless pack of hunters whose suspicions about his true nature are growing. Now that Gene has finally found something worth fighting for, his need to survive is stronger than ever—but is it worth the cost of his humanity?

Narrator Review:
     Right out of the gate, Sean Runnette did not strike me as the right narrator for The Hunt. For one thing, his voice was far too gravely and deep to suggest "teenage boy." For another, it's slightly pedantic. Runnette won me over as I got to know Gene a little better--Gene is methodical and intensely cerebral--and these are things that are communicated through the quality of the narration. On the other hand, I've never met a male narrator who can voice a female character to my satisfaction, and Runnette is no exception.
Review Review:
     I am the world's biggest wimp. I hate gore, and I will never, ever see another boxing movie for as long as I live. The scene in the body switch episode of Glee where Tina conks her head on the bottom of a fountain nearly ruined the episode for me. I bring up my squeamishness because The Hunt is extremely graphic in terms of grossness, the eating of humans and general gore. And, yet, despite the scene where a vampire essentially turns into gooey cheese (I just vomited a little), I loved this book. I had issues with 90% of the characters, but it made me think, and it stuck with me. To me, that is the mark of seriously bada** writing.
     The most interesting question that The Hunt brings up for me is what it means to be human. Gene, the narrator, has only survived amongst these vampire-zombies by completely subverting his humanity. And while it's saved him, it's also killed him. His is a character that I was on the verge of disliking, even to the very last word. Gene flirts with being irredeemable and it's that, more than the threat of his being discovered, that kept me on the edge of my seat.
     I can't really talk about the rest of the characters because doing so would be spoilery, but I want to touch on what I said about disliking 90% of the characters. The characters I was rooting for the most were the ones the least seen. Sissy totally kicked butt and, of course, I'm a sucker for kids. They better live, do you hear me Andrew Fukuda? Fortunately, I'm fairly certain we'll be seeing a lot more of them in the next book.
     Another thing that I enjoyed about The Hunt was its sheer bizarreness. Fukuda must have had a lot of fun coming up with the whole armpit/elbow make-out scene. After I read that part, I hurried over to Small's blog because I needed to talk to her about it, pronto. There are plenty of bits from the world-building that will make you go, Wait, WHAT?! And then there's the wrist-scratching.
     Finally, there were definitely times when suspension of disbelief was required. When Gene gets chosen for the Heper Hunt, it means leaving behind all the tools of his deception. The vampire-zombies don't sweat, bathe, have hair, require water and, apparently have perfectly groomed fingernails. Fukuda makes a big deal about all the rules Gene's father taught him to survive. Some of the problems are addressed--the need for water being one of them. But others--the lack of deodorant, how he got a razor, etc.--required the readers to look the other way. Not to mention the sheer unbelievability of being in control of yourself at all times. Humans just aren't made that way. Or maybe I just mean that I'm just not made that way. Who knows.
     I highly recommend The Hunt for anyone interested in the Paranormal and Dystopian genres. In fact, I recommend it to almost anyone, period. It's insanely gripping, thought-provoking and exciting. The only problem? The sequel isn't even listed on Goodreads yet.
  But wait! I'm not done talking about The Hunt!
Join me tomorrow (Monday, May 28) for an in-depth, spoilery discussion!
5 Matryoshkas: I would move in with this book.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Top Off Tuesday: And One for @sprntrlsnark

     Cribbed from On a Book Bender--It’s that time again — Tuesday! — which means [we] give you shirtless men and you try to steal them away from [us]. (All spoken for, sorry!) Top Off Tuesdays was started by FeliciaChristi and [Amanda].  It is where [ALL OF US] share the book covers that make us swoon.  Head over to Felicia’s blog to share your Top Off Tuesday link or to see what everyone has posted. (Believe me when I tell you it's worth it.)

Ask and you shall receive, Jenny!
Paisley Szuzman came to the Laurel Ridge Ranch in Daly, Wyoming to interview for an administrative position, but she’s shocked, and secretly aroused, to find that the job might entail more than she envisioned. Anyone filling this spot must meet the criteria of plays well with others, and the “others” are the men on the ranch— four hunky cowboys who are pure, rugged temptation. Adventurous to the core, Paisley takes the challenge and finds more in store for her than she ever imagined.

A few things I'd like to mention:
  1. Any "foursome" searches that may or may not have occurred on my computer were strictly for Top Off Tuesday purposes. 
  2. Paisley Szuzman appears to be sitting on one of the cowboy's heads. And, also, her name is stupid.
  3. Anyone dare me to find a cover with five topless men? ANYONE?!
Happy Tuesday, everyone!